SD Canvassing strikes another blow for the citizens by asking these pertinent and unanswered questions. The problem is in the first sentence..."Any person who, directly or INDIRECTLY, utters or addresses any threat......" Now is that a 'witnessed' or "She said- she said!" accusation? This sounds eerily like a modified RED FLAG law!!! GUILTY!....until proved innocent!!!
Let's see who's on this Senate State Affairs Committee: Schoenbeck, Wheeler, Nesiba, Duhamel, Tobin, Rohl, Crabtree, Davis and Diedrich - who was excused on this vote.
Ironically, and maybe not surprisingly, all of the above, except Diedrich, were involved either directly, or indirectly with last session's Kangaroo Court called the Senate Select Committee on Discipline and Expulsion.
I am in another state, but I am sure it is relevant to all 50. Thanks for info
Yes, it's a national effort against the people.
Talk about a "Vagueness Doctrine"!
SD Canvassing strikes another blow for the citizens by asking these pertinent and unanswered questions. The problem is in the first sentence..."Any person who, directly or INDIRECTLY, utters or addresses any threat......" Now is that a 'witnessed' or "She said- she said!" accusation? This sounds eerily like a modified RED FLAG law!!! GUILTY!....until proved innocent!!!
Let's see who's on this Senate State Affairs Committee: Schoenbeck, Wheeler, Nesiba, Duhamel, Tobin, Rohl, Crabtree, Davis and Diedrich - who was excused on this vote.
Ironically, and maybe not surprisingly, all of the above, except Diedrich, were involved either directly, or indirectly with last session's Kangaroo Court called the Senate Select Committee on Discipline and Expulsion.
Thanks SD Canvassing and keep up your great work!
COMMUNISTS!